<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MDM outside the box</title>
	<link>http://andyonenterprisesoftware.com/2008/02/mdm-outside-the-box/</link>
	<description>Andy Hayler, noted industry expert and founder of Kalido, gives his view on developments in the enterprise software market. Issues covered include data warehousing, master data management, business intelligence and corporate performance management.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Scott Lee</title>
		<link>http://andyonenterprisesoftware.com/2008/02/mdm-outside-the-box/#comment-68329</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://andyonenterprisesoftware.com/2008/02/mdm-outside-the-box/#comment-68329</guid>
					<description>Andy - I agree there is an unmet need around this (lack of) capability.  With the good of the end consumer in mind, I wonder if there might not be value added by having a data standard (in the mode of EDI transactions, but specific to external data providers) which could ease at least part of the semantics-translation challenge posed by this requirement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy - I agree there is an unmet need around this (lack of) capability.  With the good of the end consumer in mind, I wonder if there might not be value added by having a data standard (in the mode of EDI transactions, but specific to external data providers) which could ease at least part of the semantics-translation challenge posed by this requirement.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
