<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Gaul of it</title>
	<link>http://andyonenterprisesoftware.com/2007/12/the-gaul-of-it/</link>
	<description>Andy Hayler, founder of Kalido and The Information Difference, gives his views on the enterprise software market. Issues covered include data warehousing, master data management, business intelligence and data quality.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: admin</title>
		<link>http://andyonenterprisesoftware.com/2007/12/the-gaul-of-it/#comment-56025</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://andyonenterprisesoftware.com/2007/12/the-gaul-of-it/#comment-56025</guid>
					<description>Fair point, but outside of customer data for telcos and a few other situations, most master data is not large in volume (e.g. product info, asset, or even &quot;customer&quot; in any B2B business). Complexity rather than volume is mostly the issue here, so I don't see why an XML database should not be a reasonable choice for this kind of application.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair point, but outside of customer data for telcos and a few other situations, most master data is not large in volume (e.g. product info, asset, or even &#8220;customer&#8221; in any B2B business). Complexity rather than volume is mostly the issue here, so I don&#8217;t see why an <acronym title="eXtensible Markup Language">XML</acronym> database should not be a reasonable choice for this kind of application.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nigel</title>
		<link>http://andyonenterprisesoftware.com/2007/12/the-gaul-of-it/#comment-55998</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://andyonenterprisesoftware.com/2007/12/the-gaul-of-it/#comment-55998</guid>
					<description>Berkeley DB comes in three flavours (basic key/value, a Java edition, and the XQuery/XML stuff). I suspect the bulk of mobile installations are of the basic/Java variety. Maybe this is a bit of a red herring as far as the suitability of an XML store for MDM goes?

Regards Nigel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Berkeley DB comes in three flavours (basic key/value, a Java edition, and the XQuery/XML stuff). I suspect the bulk of mobile installations are of the basic/Java variety. Maybe this is a bit of a red herring as far as the suitability of an <acronym title="eXtensible Markup Language">XML</acronym> store for MDM goes?</p>
<p>Regards Nigel
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
