<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Psst, wanna buy a BI vendor?</title>
	<link>http://andyonenterprisesoftware.com/2006/04/psst-wanna-buy-a-bi-vendor/</link>
	<description>Andy Hayler, noted industry expert and founder of Kalido, gives his view on developments in the enterprise software market. Issues covered include data warehousing, master data management, business intelligence and corporate performance management.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://andyonenterprisesoftware.com/2006/04/psst-wanna-buy-a-bi-vendor/#comment-79</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://andyonenterprisesoftware.com/2006/04/psst-wanna-buy-a-bi-vendor/#comment-79</guid>
					<description>Apart from the problems SAP might have regarding interfacing with Non-SAP apps, I feel it could be the best bet among the emerging BI contenders viz. Microsoft,Oracle et al. 
 
 The good news for SAP is it is realising this limitation and trying to be more flexible, and the bad news is others are not going to just party in the meantime.

 As for IBM I would like to know if it is really serious about BI and what measures it is taking to take a long call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apart from the problems SAP might have regarding interfacing with Non-SAP apps, I feel it could be the best bet among the emerging BI contenders viz. Microsoft,Oracle et al. </p>
<p> The good news for SAP is it is realising this limitation and trying to be more flexible, and the bad news is others are not going to just party in the meantime.</p>
<p> As for IBM I would like to know if it is really serious about BI and what measures it is taking to take a long call.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
