<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The hollowing out of ERP</title>
	<link>http://andyonenterprisesoftware.com/2006/03/the-hollowing-out-of-erp/</link>
	<description>Andy Hayler, noted industry expert and founder of Kalido, gives his view on developments in the enterprise software market. Issues covered include data warehousing, master data management, business intelligence and corporate performance management.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Nitin</title>
		<link>http://andyonenterprisesoftware.com/2006/03/the-hollowing-out-of-erp/#comment-57</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://andyonenterprisesoftware.com/2006/03/the-hollowing-out-of-erp/#comment-57</guid>
					<description>I wonder.  I agree that individual components like &quot;your favorite cost allocation module&quot; may be pluggable, but would you be willing to take the headache of maintaining a best of breed (aka &quot;one of its kind&quot;) setup?  Many of us have already traversed that path in the past.  Single source of data, interoperability, free data flow across diverse applications like Manufacturing and Financials are what make ERP still very attractive value propositions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder.  I agree that individual components like &#8220;your favorite cost allocation module&#8221; may be pluggable, but would you be willing to take the headache of maintaining a best of breed (aka &#8220;one of its kind&#8221;) setup?  Many of us have already traversed that path in the past.  Single source of data, interoperability, free data flow across diverse applications like Manufacturing and Financials are what make ERP still very attractive value propositions.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
